Construct a neural acceptance or abstention set from calibration samples together with an explicit boundary map selecting the samples that determine the set. If the map is proper projective and its cross-sample complexity profile is stable, the conditional violation risk has an exact beta law indexed by boundary size rather than network parameter count. This provides a falsifiable, distribution-free certificate for neural selective classifiers and learned safety filters.
Attach a finite-sample conformal error radius to a neural surrogate of a dynamical or sequence model, and propagate that radius through the model's local sensitivity. The model should expose a calibrated prediction set or abstain whenever the accumulated bound exceeds a task-specific tolerance, making long-horizon failure a measurable coverage event rather than an unobserved drift.
Use the paper's Lp inequality to construct an empirical certificate for a neural network's generalization gap. Estimate cross-example interaction beta with coordinate-replacement probes and estimate the single-example fluctuation M by conditional resampling; use the resulting certificate for checkpoint selection or as a stability-aware hyperparameter objective.
Construct a data-dependent threshold for future cumulative safety violations using the paper's decision-centric large-deviation profile instead of a plug-in estimate. For binary violation increments, the threshold explicitly accounts for both uncertainty in the historical violation rate and the probability that the future process produces an unusually large maximum.
Freeze a neural backbone and replace heuristic last-layer uncertainty with a confidence region derived from the paper's uniform logistic likelihood-ratio bound. For a binary head, accept a prediction only when every head parameter in the confidence region gives the same label; otherwise abstain or request an additional label. The threshold also gives a principled stopping rule for fine-tuning the head.