Unverified 2026

Granularity-Aware Feasible Routing

Implementation & benchmark of arXiv:2608.08371 — Bid Lattices and the Value of Flexibility:A Granularity Ratio for Capacity Markets

Usefulness6/10
Difficulty5/10
Novelty7/10

Source paper: Bid Lattices and the Value of Flexibility:A Granularity Ratio for Capacity Markets arXiv:2608.08371 ⓘ · analyzed Sep 1, 2026

AI-generated research hypothesis, automatically tested. Not peer-reviewed.

Idea description

Replace a continuous allocation or routing decision with a lattice-valued decision whose unit size is explicitly normalized by total capacity. Round allocations downward rather than to the nearest lattice point, preserving per-example capacity feasibility, and train or evaluate against the resulting granularity ratio rather than treating discretization as an implementation detail.

Formulas

$$\rho=\frac{\delta}{P},\qquad Q_\delta(a)=\delta\left\lfloor\frac{a}{\delta}\right\rfloor,\qquad 0\le a-Q_\delta(a)<\delta.$$
$$0\le R(a)-R(Q_\delta(a))\le M\delta=M\rho P.$$
$$A_{\max}=\delta\left\lfloor\frac{P}{\delta}\right\rfloor=P\rho\left\lfloor\frac{1}{\rho}\right\rfloor.$$
$$F(cP,c\delta)=F(P,\delta),\quad\text{when }F\text{ is normalized by }P\text{ and the model is positively homogeneous.}$$

Mathematical statement

Let $P>0$ be total capacity, $\delta>0$ the indivisible allocation unit, and $\rho=\delta/P$ the granularity ratio. A continuous allocation $a\in[0,P]$ is made feasible on the lattice by $Q_\delta(a)=\delta\lfloor a/\delta\rfloor$, which satisfies $0\le Q_\delta(a)\le a$ and $0\le a-Q_\delta(a)<\delta$. If an objective $R(a)$ is nondecreasing and its marginal value is bounded by $M$ per unit allocation, then $0\le R(a)-R(Q_\delta(a))\le M\delta=M\rho P$. For total capacity $P$, the largest representable allocation is $\delta\lfloor P/\delta\rfloor=P\rho\lfloor1/\rho\rfloor$, leaving unused capacity $P-\delta\lfloor P/\delta\rfloor$. Under positive homogeneity, normalized performance depends on $\rho$ rather than $P$ and $\delta$ separately.

Implementation notes

1. Integration point: apply this to a capacity-constrained mixture-of-experts router or an RL policy with a continuous gate allocation. For each input, let the router produce nonnegative expert loads $a_e$ whose sum is at most total token capacity $P$. Choose a token or capacity quantum $\delta$, and use the rounded allocation for dispatch. 2. Pseudocode: compute router scores; convert scores into nonnegative allocations $a_e$; optionally project them onto $\sum_e a_e\le P$; set $\hat a_e=\delta\lfloor a_e/\delta\rfloor$; dispatch at most $\hat a_e$ tokens to expert $e$; compute task loss and optionally penalize unused capacity $P-\sum_e\hat a_e$; backpropagate through $a_e$ with a straight-through estimator. During training, replace the hard floor in the backward pass by the identity or a clipped sigmoid surrogate. 3. Compute $\rho$, rounded capacity, and unused capacity exactly. Estimate $M$ empirically from validation perturbations as the largest loss reduction per additional assigned token or capacity unit. 4. First cheap experiment: compare continuous routing, nearest rounding, and downward rounding in a small Switch-style MoE on CIFAR-100 or a synthetic load-balancing task. Sweep $\rho\in\{0.01,0.02,0.05,0.1,0.2,0.5\}$ while scaling $P$ and $\delta$ together. The prediction is that normalized performance curves approximately collapse for equal $\rho$, downward rounding never violates capacity, and the task-loss gap remains below roughly $M\rho P$. Utilization should show sawtooth discontinuities when $1/\rho$ crosses an integer, with increased unused capacity near ratios just above $1/k$.

Verification

This idea has not been verified yet.

Verification happens in two stages: Stage 1 — a mechanism check on a toy system confirms the claimed mathematical phenomenon reproduces; Stage 2 — a benchmark implements the idea on a real (small) neural network task and compares it against a tuned baseline over 8 paired seeds with a permutation test.

Artifacts

Artifacts unavailable.