Maslov Phase Budget for Symplectic Recurrence
Implementation & benchmark of arXiv:2609.03061 — Maslov Indicies In Symplectic Geometry Revisited
Source paper: Maslov Indicies In Symplectic Geometry Revisited arXiv:2609.03061 ⓘ · analyzed Sep 4, 2026
AI-generated research hypothesis, automatically tested. Not peer-reviewed.
Idea description
Use the paper's explicit compact factor of a symplectic state-transition matrix to measure aggregate rotation speed in hidden-state dynamics. Penalize excessive or rapidly varying angular velocity rather than penalizing the full recurrent matrix, preserving nontrivial Hamiltonian rotations while suppressing phase drift that can destabilize long sequences.
Formulas
Mathematical statement
For a real symplectic matrix M = [[a,b],[c,d]] in Sp(2n,R), define D[M] = a^T a + c^T c, which is symmetric positive definite, and define the unitary representative G[M] = (a+i c)D[M]^{-1/2}. Here a,b,c,d are n-by-n real blocks, i is the imaginary unit, and D[M]^{-1/2} is the positive-definite inverse square root. The paper states that G[M] is unitary and induces the same Lagrangian-subspace image as M. For a differentiable compact path U(t) = K(V(t) Diag(t) V(t)^{-1}), where K embeds a complex unitary matrix into a real symplectic matrix and Diag(t) contains planar rotations R(theta_j(t)), the paper derives Trace(J U'(t) U(t)^{-1}) = 2 sum_j d theta_j(t)/dt. We use q_t = Trace(J (U_t-U_{t-1}) U_{t-1}^{-1})/(2 Delta t) as a discrete aggregate angular velocity and add lambda_phase q_t^2 plus lambda_tv(q_t-q_{t-1})^2 to the sequence loss. J is the standard 2n-by-2n symplectic matrix, Delta t is the step size, and lambda_phase and lambda_tv are nonnegative hyperparameters.
Implementation notes
Integrate this at the recurrent transition, not at the input projection. Build a symplectic hidden-state matrix M_t for each sequence step, for example from a Hamiltonian exponential M_t = exp(JH_t) with H_t symmetric, or from a learned symplectic matrix shared across time. Partition M_t into n-by-n blocks a_t,b_t,c_t,d_t. Compute D_t = a_t^T a_t + c_t^T c_t, obtain D_t^{-1/2} by an eigendecomposition for the first MVP or by Newton-Schulz iterations for larger models, and form the complex matrix G_t = (a_t+i c_t)D_t^{-1/2}. Convert G_t to its real symplectic embedding U_t = K(G_t). For t greater than zero, calculate q_t = Trace(J (U_t-U_{t-1}) U_{t-1}^{-1})/(2 Delta t); use a linear solve instead of explicitly forming U_{t-1}^{-1}. Add lambda_phase times q_t squared to the task loss and optionally lambda_tv times (q_t-q_{t-1}) squared. Do not detach U_t so gradients reach the recurrent parameters. The paper supplies the compact factor and trace identity; the engineer estimates q_t by finite differences and computes matrix functions numerically. Start with a 64-dimensional symplectic RNN on sequential MNIST and a copy-memory task of lengths 100, 500, and 1000. Compare vanilla tanh, orthogonal RNN, unregularized symplectic RNN, and the proposed loss at equal parameter count. Track gradient norm, hidden-state norm, q_t variance, and accuracy versus sequence length. Success means lower long-horizon gradient variance and at least 5 percentage points higher copy accuracy at length 1000 without more than 10 percent training slowdown.
Verification
This idea has not been verified yet.
Verification happens in two stages: Stage 1 — a mechanism check on a toy system confirms the claimed mathematical phenomenon reproduces; Stage 2 — a benchmark implements the idea on a real (small) neural network task and compares it against a tuned baseline over 8 paired seeds with a permutation test.
Artifacts
Artifacts unavailable.