Score Accuracy Along the Forward Diffusion Does Not Certify Numerical Stability in Diffusion Sampling
arXiv:2607.08757
2026
Sampling
1 ideas extracted · analyzed Aug 30, 2026
What the math gives to ML
This paper exposes a serious mismatch between standard score-matching objectives and the behavior of discretized reverse diffusion: a score can be highly accurate under forward marginals while producing rare numerical trajectories with exploding moments. The transferable asset is a constructive stability mechanism, not merely the counterexample: when the clean-data support lies in a known bounded closed convex set, projecting the denoiser onto that set preserves pointwise accuracy while preventing unbounded denoiser outputs. The most direct neural-network intervention is therefore to project the denoiser output at every reverse-sampling step, then convert the projected denoiser back into a score before applying the reverse SDE or ODE update.
Ideas from this paper
△ Mechanism confirmed, baseline not beaten
2026
For additive-noise diffusion, train or interpret the network as a denoiser and project its predicted clean sample onto a known bounded closed convex set containing the data support. Convert the projected denoiser back into a score before each Euler-Maruyama or probability-flow ODE step. The projection is nonexpansive relative to the true denoiser, so it cannot increase pointwise denoising error when the true conditional mean belongs to the set, while it imposes a hard bound that suppresses rare…
Useful8/10
Difficulty3/10
Novelty7/10