Scaling Limits of Constant-Stepsize SGD at Flat Minima

arXiv:2607.16384 2026 Optimization 1 ideas extracted · analyzed Aug 30, 2026

What the math gives to ML

The paper identifies a concrete failure of the standard constant-step SGD heuristic near flat minima: the stationary error scales as \(\alpha^{1/m}\), not \(\sqrt{\alpha}\), when the Hessian vanishes with local flatness exponent \(m>2\). This gives an actionable rule for selecting stepsizes from a desired stationary-radius budget, together with a mixing-time prediction of order \(\alpha^{-(m-1)}\). The most promising transfer is a flatness-calibrated constant-step optimizer that estimates local curvature decay, chooses \(\alpha\) according to the measured exponent, and optionally uses different stepsizes across parameter blocks. The resulting method is falsifiable through stationary parameter-radius, loss-floor, and equal-FLOP convergence measurements.

Ideas from this paper

Mechanism failed 2026

Flatness-Calibrated Constant-Step SGD

Replace a globally chosen constant learning rate with a blockwise rate calibrated to the local flatness exponent of the objective. If the local Hessian decays like \(\|x-x_\star\|^{m-2}\), choose the rate so that the predicted stationary parameter radius \(\alpha^{1/m}\) matches a prescribed exploration or optimization radius, rather than incorrectly using the quadratic rule \(\sqrt{\alpha}\).

Useful7/10
Difficulty5/10
Novelty7/10
Paper: Scaling Limits of Constant-Stepsize SGD at Flat Minima arXiv:2607.16384