Neighbourhood complexity and identification problems for graphs of bounded treewidth and pathwidth
arXiv:2607.16889
2026
Memory
1 ideas extracted · analyzed Aug 30, 2026
What the math gives to ML
The paper gives sharp upper bounds on the number of distinct closed-neighborhood patterns that a vertex set S can induce in graphs of bounded treewidth or pathwidth. The transferable asset is a provably small dictionary of adjacency signatures, with at most (k-w+1)2^w+w signatures for treewidth w and at most (k-w+2)2^{w-1}+2k-w-2 for pathwidth w. A graph neural network can exploit this by selecting k landmark vertices, grouping all nodes with identical landmark-neighborhood signatures, and computing landmark-mediated messages once per signature rather than traversing every node-landmark relation. This is most promising for graph-transformer or dense landmark-attention layers on graphs with known or estimated low-width decompositions, where the signature dictionary gives a falsifiable memory and inference-speed reduction.
Ideas from this paper
Unverified
2026
Replace a dense node-to-landmark graph-attention or message-passing relation by a dictionary of distinct landmark-neighborhood signatures. Nodes sharing the same signature reuse the same structural landmark aggregate, while their individual hidden states are still passed through the output MLP, preserving node-specific predictions. On bounded-treewidth graphs the number of distinct signatures is provably linear in the number k of landmarks, with an explicit dependence on treewidth.
Useful6/10
Difficulty5/10
Novelty7/10