Scale Weight Decay and Train Better
arXiv:2607.23777
2026
Optimization
1 ideas extracted · analyzed Aug 30, 2026
What the math gives to ML
The paper identifies a principled mismatch in decoupled weight decay: a constant decay coefficient continues shrinking parameters even when the learning rate becomes small, introducing asymptotic bias relative to the unregularized optimizer. Its transferable mechanism is to scale the decay coefficient by the instantaneous learning-rate fraction, so decay is strongest near the peak learning rate and weakens automatically during cooldown and late training. This retains early-training stabilization while reducing persistent parameter-norm drift. The first implementation should modify AdamW or momentum SGD, followed by a matrix-wise optimizer such as Muon.
Ideas from this paper
✓✓ Beats tuned baseline
2026
Replace constant decoupled weight decay with a coefficient proportional to the current learning rate divided by the peak learning rate. The optimizer applies ordinary decay at the learning-rate peak but weakens decay during cooldown and late training, preventing unnecessary steady-state parameter-norm shrinkage while retaining early-training stabilization.
Useful7/10
Difficulty2/10
Novelty6/10