Posterior Convergence without Force Convergence: Resolution-Stable Sampling for Rough Bayesian Inverse Problems
arXiv:2608.18365
2026
Sampling
1 ideas extracted · analyzed Sep 1, 2026
What the math gives to ML
The paper isolates a failure mode for refinement-based samplers: rough potentials can have stable posteriors while their classical derivatives become increasingly resolution-dependent. Its most transferable construction is a dilation-matched finite-difference field derived from the exact scale recursion of Weierstrass potentials. This field can be inserted into kick-drift-kick proposals and corrected by Metropolis acceptance without requiring it to be the gradient of a differentiable potential. The resulting sampler is testable on neural energy models with multiscale or nonsmooth components by measuring whether acceptance and effective sample size remain stable as resolution increases.
Ideas from this paper
△ Mechanism confirmed, baseline not beaten
2026
Replace the unstable classical derivative of a discretized rough energy component with a matched dilation quotient derived from its intrinsic scale recursion. Use this field inside kick-drift-kick proposals and apply an exact Metropolis correction, allowing the proposal field to be measurable and nonconservative rather than an exact neural-energy gradient. The experiment should test whether acceptance rates and posterior samples remain stable as the rough-energy resolution increases.
Useful7/10
Difficulty5/10
Novelty8/10