A Mini-Batch Counterexample to Last-Iterate Convergence in Definable Optimization

arXiv:2608.19074 2026 Training 1 ideas extracted · analyzed Sep 1, 2026

What the math gives to ML

This paper gives a concrete failure mode for mini-batch stochastic approximation that is stronger than a generic warning about noise: even convex, semialgebraic, piecewise-affine objectives can produce bounded iterates whose accumulation set is an entire flat interval rather than a single point. The mechanism is batch-dependent minimum-norm selection, which turns the updates on successive scales into lazy reflected random walks on nested dyadic lattices. For neural-network optimizers, the transferable lesson is to treat vanishing stepsize conditions such as \(\alpha_k=o(1/\log k)\) as insufficient for last-iterate stability when stochastic subgradients remain active on flat or nearly-flat regions. A practical adaptation is a convergence-safe decay or noise-damping guard that enforces square-summable effective update magnitudes, while measuring whether late iterates continue to explore a low-loss region.

Ideas from this paper

Unverified 2026

Square-Summable Noise Guard

Add a late-training safeguard that decays the effective stochastic update scale fast enough to make the accumulated update variance finite. The safeguard is motivated by the paper's bounded reflected-random-walk counterexample: iterates can keep traversing an entire flat critical set forever even though the stepsize tends to zero and the objective values remain optimal.

Useful5/10
Difficulty3/10
Novelty3/10
Paper: A Mini-Batch Counterexample to Last-Iterate Convergence in Definable Optimization arXiv:2608.19074