Open-Loop Riemannian Frank--Wolfe: Fast Rates under Error Bounds and Scaling Inequalities

arXiv:2608.21598 2026 Optimization 1 ideas extracted · analyzed Sep 1, 2026

What the math gives to ML

The paper gives a non-adaptive step-size principle for Frank–Wolfe updates on curved feasible sets: setting the step solely from the iteration index can achieve polynomial rates under geometric error bounds, without line searches or gradient-based feedback. This is potentially useful for neural layers whose parameters lie on spheres, geodesic balls, or other Riemannian constraint sets, where projection or retraction can be expensive or distort the constraint. The most practical transfer is a Riemannian Frank–Wolfe optimizer for unit-norm or spherical parameter blocks, using the schedule \(\eta_k=a/(k+a)\) and testing whether recent-window Frank–Wolfe gaps exhibit the predicted decay. The guarantee is conditional on a local Hölderian error bound and directional scaling inequality, so these assumptions should be treated as experimentally testable diagnostics rather than claimed universally.

Ideas from this paper

Unverified 2026

Open-loop geodesic Frank–Wolfe for spherical weight blocks

Replace projected or retracted updates for constrained spherical parameter blocks with a geodesic Frank–Wolfe update and an iteration-only step size \(\eta_k=a/(k+a)\). The method moves along a minimizing geodesic toward a feasible linear-oracle point, avoiding repeated projection and eliminating line-search or gap-feedback overhead. On locally error-bounded objectives, the paper predicts accelerated polynomial convergence, including \(O(k^{-2})\) for strongly geodesically convex objectives…

Useful6/10
Difficulty6/10
Novelty7/10
Paper: Open-Loop Riemannian Frank--Wolfe: Fast Rates under Error Bounds and Scaling Inequalities arXiv:2608.21598