Relative-Degree Wall Restricts Passivity-Based Stability Analysis in Inverter-Dominant Grids
arXiv:2608.29474
2026
Architecture
1 ideas extracted · analyzed Sep 1, 2026
What the math gives to ML
The paper identifies a structural limitation of standard passivity analysis: a nonzero passive transfer relation under the usual supply rate must have relative degree no greater than one, so high-fidelity models with electromagnetic or other strictly higher-order input-output delays cannot be certified by ordinary passivity. Its transferable asset is a design test for passive neural state-space and sequence models: inspect the local input-output relative degree before attempting to enforce a passivity certificate. The practical neural-network construction is to expose a direct or first-order input-to-output pathway, while placing additional dynamics in internal states, and to certify the resulting linearization with a storage-function/KYP inequality. A falsifiable prediction is that models whose learned linearization has relative degree two or larger will fail the standard passivity LMI regardless of training, whereas adding a feedthrough or first-order pathway will make certification feasible.
Ideas from this paper
Unverified
2026
Construct a neural state-space model with an explicit first-order input-to-output path instead of forcing every output to depend only on deeply propagated hidden states. Penalize or reject learned linearizations whose transfer matrix has relative degree greater than one, then train a storage-function certificate for the remaining passive dynamics. This preserves the paper's relative-degree compatibility condition while allowing high-order internal memory.
Useful6/10
Difficulty6/10
Novelty7/10