Which LLM for Which Work? Budgeted Model Allocation under Uncertain Evaluation
arXiv:2608.29560
2026
Optimization
1 ideas extracted · analyzed Sep 1, 2026
What the math gives to ML
The paper provides a decision-focused way to handle uncertain quality estimates: instead of requiring the entire model-quality table to be identified, test whether the same budget-feasible allocation remains optimal over an explicitly defined uncertainty set. This is transferable to mixture-of-experts routing, cascaded inference, and learned model selection, where expert accuracy, latency, and cost are uncertain and the routing decision is globally coupled by a compute budget. The most useful adaptation is a nominal-versus-adversarial allocation certificate, followed by targeted evaluation only on model-input pairs that can change the allocation. This can turn uncertainty estimates into a practical routing-freezing or active-profiling mechanism rather than merely adding a generic robustness penalty.
Ideas from this paper
✗ Mechanism failed
2026
Replace point-estimate expert routing with a nominal allocation and a least-favourable allocation under uncertainty in expert quality. If both allocations agree, use that route confidently; if they disagree, profile or evaluate only the expert-input pairs responsible for the disagreement. The same mechanism can be used offline to assign workloads to LLMs or online to choose among heterogeneous experts under a latency or FLOP budget.
Useful7/10
Difficulty6/10
Novelty7/10