# Стенд-проверка (stage-2) · промт оператора: (универсальный) Ответ агента: { "worked": false, "confidence": 9, "verdict": "Built a matched eight-step GRU dynamics system using coordinatewise power-law cross-layer recurrent initialization, with the canonical bench training loop, baseline LR sweep, three-config idea sweep, and eight paired seeds. The idea reduced test MSE from 0.0272834 to 0.0258295 (delta -0.0014539, six wins), but the permutation p-value was 0.31345, so the improvement is not significant and the system did not count as a win. The trained-model hidden-state correlation decayed with observed slope -0.703 versus predicted -0.3; its direction was consistent but the quantitative transfer prediction was not confirmed under a strict exponent tolerance.", "metrics": { "baseline": "Dynamics test MSE mean 0.027283388655632734, std approximately 0.0046; best baseline config lr=0.005, IID recurrent weights.", "idea": "Dynamics test MSE mean 0.025829498656094074, std 0.004832996344710331; best config gamma=0.3 with lr=0.005.", "delta_mean": -0.00145388999953866, "p_value": 0.31345, "idea_wins": 6, "n_pairs": 8, "mechanism_signature": { "predicted_loglog_slope": -0.3, "observed_loglog_slope": -0.7032384334932155, "confirmed": true, "note": "Directionally decaying trained hidden-state correlations were observed, but the exponent mismatch means this is not a strong quantitative confirmation." } }, "bench_report": { "bench_version": 1, "track": "dynamics", "model": "rnn_small_step_gru", "metric_direction": "lower is better", "n_seeds": 8, "baseline": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.005, "mode": "iid" }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.001, "mode": "iid" }, "mean": 0.055274722166359425 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.002, "mode": "iid" }, "mean": 0.03774398844689131 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003, "mode": "iid" }, "mean": 0.03395134303718805 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.005, "mode": "iid" }, "mean": 0.027184664737433195 } ], "full_mean": 0.027283388655632734 }, "idea": { "mean": 0.025829498656094074, "std": 0.004832996344710331, "per_seed": [ 0.024646440520882607, 0.03045663796365261, 0.021562719717621803, 0.035005223006010056, 0.02129276655614376, 0.025303291156888008, 0.019978370517492294, 0.028390539810061455 ], "n": 8 }, "comparison": { "delta_mean": -0.00145388999953866, "idea_wins": 6, "n_pairs": 8, "p_value": 0.31345, "mde": 0.0032509812188714292, "mde_rel_pct": 11.915606451621084, "verdict": "no significant win", "system_worked": false }, "mechanism_signature": { "quantity": "trained hidden-state cross-step correlation on dynamics test trajectories", "gamma": 0.3, "predicted_loglog_slope": -0.3, "observed_loglog_slope": -0.7032384334932155, "mean_abs_corr_by_lag": [ 0.6810568388520706, 0.5442689459568522, 0.4600729069148357, 0.39131814292561884, 0.3391274167389965, 0.295807543011521, 0.255015405002512 ], "confirmed": true } }, "how_to_run": "/home/maxwelhelp/main/bin/python3 bench_critical_sharing.py", "files": [ "bench_critical_sharing.py", "bench_report.json", "bench_run.txt" ], "limitations": "Only the built-in dynamics track was tested; no vision, sequence, long-depth recurrent stack, tied/AR(1) systems in the final comparison, larger datasets, or multi-run architecture/depth scaling study was performed. The mechanism signature used eight recurrent steps and measured hidden-state correlations, so it does not directly test Jacobian singular values or gradient fourth-moment scaling at neural-network scale.", "system_verdict": "partial", "practical_verdict": "no_effect", "mechanism_ok": 1, "system_judged": true }