# Стенд-проверка (stage-2) · промт оператора: (универсальный) Ответ агента: { "worked": false, "confidence": 10, "verdict": "The H-infinity-inspired Jacobian disturbance-gain penalty was implemented for the matched controlled-pendulum dynamics task using the same rnn_small GRU as baseline. The full paired benchmark showed no improvement: the idea exactly matched the tuned baseline, with paired delta 0 and permutation p=1.0. The trained-model sensitivity signature was also unchanged, so the proposed mechanism was not confirmed.", "metrics": { "baseline": "Best lr=0.006; 8-seed test MSE mean=0.0005194859513721894, std=0.0001693891077925739.", "idea": "Best shared lr=0.006; 8-seed test MSE mean=0.0005194859513721894, std=0.0001693891077925739; paired delta=0.0, p=1.0, wins=0/8." }, "bench_report": { "bench_version": 1, "track": "dynamics", "model": "rnn_small", "metric_direction": "lower is better", "n_seeds": 8, "baseline": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.006 }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.001 }, "mean": 0.0015310924500226974 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003 }, "mean": 0.0008559521666029468 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006 }, "mean": 0.0005687399534508586 } ], "full": { "mean": 0.0005194859513721894, "std": 0.0001693891077925739, "per_seed": [ 0.0005914251087233424, 0.0007362987380474806, 0.00035295303678140044, 0.0005942829302512109, 0.0002958264376502484, 0.0005069610779173672, 0.00032333534909412265, 0.0007548049325123429 ], "n": 8 } }, "idea": { "mean": 0.0005194859513721894, "std": 0.0001693891077925739, "per_seed": [ 0.0005914251087233424, 0.0007362987380474806, 0.00035295303678140044, 0.0005942829302512109, 0.0002958264376502484, 0.0005069610779173672, 0.00032333534909412265, 0.0007548049325123429 ], "n": 8 }, "comparison": { "delta_mean": 0.0, "idea_wins": 0, "n_pairs": 8, "per_seed_diffs": [ 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ], "p_value": 1.0, "mde": 0.0, "mde_rel_pct": 0.0, "verdict": "no measurable effect", "system_worked": false }, "mechanism_signature": { "claim": "bounded-real attenuation reduces local input-disturbance gain", "gamma": 0.5, "idea_lr": 0.006, "baseline_observed_mean_local_gain": 0.431841354817152, "idea_observed_mean_local_gain": 0.431841354817152, "baseline_observed_p95_local_gain": 0.4626914465799927, "idea_observed_p95_local_gain": 0.4626914465799927, "baseline_task_mse_at_same_lr": 0.0005194859513721894, "idea_task_mse_at_same_lr": 0.0005194859513721894, "confirmed": false }, "idea_sweep": [ { "lr": 0.001, "mean": 0.0015310924500226974 }, { "lr": 0.003, "mean": 0.0008559521666029468 }, { "lr": 0.006, "mean": 0.0005687399534508586 } ], "structural_match": "controlled damped pendulum; stability/control track" }, "how_to_run": "/home/maxwelhelp/main/bin/python3 stage2_bench.py", "files": [ "stage2_bench.py", "bench_report.json" ], "limitations": "Only the registered built-in controlled-pendulum dynamics track was tested. The intervention is a finite-dimensional Jacobian-gain penalty proxy rather than a full learned observer with explicit latent P, time-varying plant Jacobians, observation correction, or a formal differential LMI. Held-out impulsive-disturbance rollouts, Lorenz-63, larger models, and a true partial-observation observer head were not tested.", "system_verdict": "failed", "practical_verdict": "no_effect", "mechanism_ok": 0, "system_judged": true }