# Стенд-проверка (stage-2) · промт оператора: (универсальный) Ответ агента: { "worked": false, "confidence": 9, "verdict": "Built and evaluated a matched residual MLP on the Friedman#1 tabular benchmark using the canonical bench training loop, an 8-seed paired comparison, and a parity-preserving baseline sweep. The mathematical scaling check passed (theory H=0.8, observed H=0.821, scaled RMS ratio=1.063), but the idea had higher test MSE than the tuned iid baseline (7.037 vs 6.537; paired delta +0.499, p=0.0081) and lost on all 8 seeds. Therefore the stability signal does not translate into a benchmark training improvement in this setup.", "metrics": { "baseline": "Friedman#1 tabular residual MLP, iid gates, best swept config lr=0.006, exponent=0.5, 18 epochs; full 8-seed mean test MSE=6.5375, std=0.7963.", "idea": "Same residual MLP/data/Adam/batch/epochs and lr union, correlated Gaussian gates with alpha=0.4 and best idea exponent=0.7; full 8-seed mean test MSE=7.0365, std=0.6551.", "paired_delta": "idea - baseline = +0.4990 MSE; idea wins 0/8 seeds; permutation p=0.0081; verdict=idea worse (significant).", "math_check": "H theory=0.8, observed H=0.8213, scaled-sum RMS values=[1.3915,1.2675,1.4158,1.2996,1.4795], last/first=1.0632, passed=true.", "mechanism_signature": "Predicted adjacent gate correlation=0.7579, observed mean across trained benchmark systems=0.0362, confirmed=false." }, "bench_report": { "bench_version": 1, "track": "tabular", "model": "local_residual_mlp", "metric_direction": "lower is better", "n_seeds": 8, "baseline": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.5 }, "full": { "mean": 6.537471890449524, "std": 0.7962674958223888, "n": 8, "per_seed": [ 5.471584320068359, 6.244831562042236, 7.435494422912598, 5.489790439605713, 7.0974907875061035, 5.940451622009277, 7.106790065765381, 7.513341903686523 ] }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.001, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.5 }, "mean": 7.946774959564209 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.001, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.8 }, "mean": 10.225590229034424 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.5 }, "mean": 7.576857328414917 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.8 }, "mean": 7.316884994506836 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.5 }, "mean": 6.160425186157227 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.8 }, "mean": 7.347582578659058 } ] }, "idea": { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "epochs": 18, "exponent": 0.7 }, "mean": 7.036507606506348, "std": 0.6550880229661826, "n": 8, "per_seed": [ 7.978086948394775, 6.377083778381348, 7.57796049118042, 5.985846996307373, 7.230166435241699, 6.412862300872803, 7.17480993270874, 7.555243968963623 ] }, "comparison": { "delta_mean": 0.49903571605682373, "idea_wins": 0, "n_pairs": 8, "per_seed_diffs": [ 2.506502628326416, 0.13225221633911133, 0.14246606826782227, 0.49605655670166016, 0.1326756477355957, 0.4724106788635254, 0.06801986694335938, 0.04190206527709961 ], "p_value": 0.0081, "mde": 0.6939341374663044, "mde_rel_pct": 10.61471695931971, "verdict": "idea worse (significant)", "system_worked": false }, "mechanism_signature": { "predicted_adjacent_corr": 0.757858283255199, "observed_adjacent_corr_mean": 0.03618130783796214, "confirmed": false }, "math_check": { "theory_H": 0.8, "observed_H": 0.8212929503641088, "rms_ratio_last_first": 1.0632182958840077, "passed": true } }, "how_to_run": "/home/maxwelhelp/main/bin/python3 bench_experiment.py", "files": [ "bench_experiment.py", "bench_report.json" ], "limitations": "Only the mandatory structurally appropriate tabular track was tested; no CIFAR-10, sequence, dynamics, q>1 neural-network variant, deeper residual networks, or longer training budgets were evaluated. The local implementation uses a small depth-8 residual MLP and finite-length Cholesky correlation generation rather than FFT generation or large-depth asymptotics.", "system_verdict": "failed", "practical_verdict": "harms", "mechanism_ok": 0, "system_judged": true }