# Стенд-проверка (stage-2) · промт оператора: (универсальный) Ответ агента: { "worked": false, "confidence": 10, "verdict": "Implemented the Flow-Efficiency Drift Scheduler on the structurally matched dynamics track with identical rnn_small systems and an equal 40-step budget. ESS math sanity checks passed, but the adaptive FIFO/replay controller was significantly worse than the tuned baseline: paired delta +0.00455143 MSE with permutation p=0.0081. The behavior-derived signature did not confirm the predicted low-ESS regime because mean ESS was 0.7777 and no levels crossed the low-ESS threshold.", "metrics": { "baseline": "Best lr=0.006, epochs=10; 8-seed mean test MSE=0.0034221157, std=0.0013572790", "idea": "Best lr=0.006, epochs=10; 8-seed mean test MSE=0.0079735451, std=0.0027093770; total_steps=40", "comparison": "delta_mean=+0.0045514294 (idea-baseline; lower is better), idea_wins=0/8, p_value=0.0081, verdict=idea worse (significant)", "math_check": "ESS in range=true; ESS shift-invariance absolute error=1.11e-16", "mechanism_signature": "mean_eta=0.7777271, min_eta=0.6528541, mean_drift=0.3253299, low_eta_levels=0, confirmed=false" }, "bench_report": { "bench_version": 1, "track": "dynamics", "model": "rnn_small", "metric_direction": "lower is better", "n_seeds": 8, "baseline": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "epochs": 10 }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.0015, "epochs": 10 }, "mean": 0.012571729 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003, "epochs": 10 }, "mean": 0.0039004571 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "epochs": 10 }, "mean": 0.0027824682 } ], "full": { "mean": 0.0034221157, "std": 0.001357279, "per_seed": [ 0.0037937269, 0.001276925, 0.0043086507, 0.0017505701, 0.0051162187, 0.0051568099, 0.0032697872, 0.0027042369 ], "n": 8 } }, "idea": { "mean": 0.0079735451, "std": 0.002709377, "per_seed": [ 0.0038756647, 0.0108861774, 0.0049169338, 0.0071676099, 0.0099999066, 0.0116768656, 0.0092763966, 0.005988806 ], "n": 8 }, "comparison": { "delta_mean": 0.0045514294, "idea_wins": 0, "n_pairs": 8, "per_seed_diffs": [ 8.19378e-05, 0.0096092524, 0.0006082831, 0.0054170397, 0.0048836879, 0.0065200557, 0.0060066094, 0.0032845691 ], "p_value": 0.0081, "verdict": "idea worse (significant)", "system_worked": false }, "mechanism_signature": { "mean_eta": 0.7777270546, "min_eta": 0.6528541116, "mean_drift": 0.3253299367, "low_eta_levels": 0, "initial_K": 4, "final_K": 1, "total_steps": 40, "predicted_low_eta_under_drift": true, "observed_low_eta_fraction": 0.0, "confirmed": false }, "math_check": { "ess_in_range": true, "ess_shift_error": 1.1102230246251565e-16 }, "idea_sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.0015, "epochs": 10 }, "mean": 0.1483852146 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003, "epochs": 10 }, "mean": 0.040628346 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "epochs": 10 }, "mean": 0.0283423866 } ] }, "how_to_run": "/home/maxwelhelp/main/bin/python3 bench_flow_scheduler.py", "files": [ "bench_flow_scheduler.py", "bench_report.json", "bench_run.log", "bench_run2.log" ], "limitations": "Tested only the built-in dynamics track with 400 training and 160 test examples, rnn_small, three shared lr settings, and 8 paired seeds. The benchmark diagnostic is an observable supervised residual/prediction proxy rather than true flow density ESS or local MCMC; no vision, sequence, or larger-scale neural sampling experiments were run.", "system_verdict": "failed", "practical_verdict": "harms", "mechanism_ok": 0, "system_judged": true }