# Стенд-проверка (stage-2) · промт оператора: (универсальный) Ответ агента: { "worked": false, "confidence": 9, "verdict": "Built the recursive Bellman variance intervention on the structurally matched dynamics track using the shared rnn_small backbone, with a variance head, detached recursive child variance, and between-branch variance term. Across 8 paired seeds, MSE changed from 0.004214 baseline to 0.004030 for the idea, but the paired permutation p-value was 0.9399 and only 2/8 pairs favored the idea, so there is no significant win. The trained-model mechanism signature was not confirmed: mean calibration ratio was 0.00516 rather than near 1, with weak negative q/error correlation.", "metrics": { "baseline": "Dynamics/rnn_small MSE: mean 0.00421419, std 0.00266828; tuned lr=0.01, epochs=8.", "idea": "Dynamics/rnn_small recursive variance training MSE: mean 0.00402988, std 0.00150342; selected lr=0.01, epochs=8; paired delta -0.00018431, p=0.9399, 2/8 wins.", "mechanism_signature": "Mean recursive q=0.81054 versus observed squared error 0.00542; calibration ratio mean=0.00516; q/error correlation mean=-0.0987; confirmed=false." }, "how_to_run": "/home/maxwelhelp/main/bin/python3 stage2_bench.py", "files": [ "stage2_bench.py", "bench_report.json" ], "limitations": "The initial larger run timed out after 2400 seconds, so the completed protocol used 400 training samples, 200 test samples, 8 epochs, and four stochastic branches. The recursive branch construction is an approximation using perturbations of the final input state rather than a learned environment transition model; reward/child covariance was not separately estimated. The signature aggregation contains a reporting simplification for mean q/observed error, although per-seed calibration ratios were measured from each trained model. No rollout allocation or compute-efficiency comparison was tested.", "bench_report": { "bench_version": 1, "track": "dynamics", "model": "rnn_small", "metric_direction": "lower is better", "n_seeds": 8, "baseline": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.01, "epochs": 8 }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.001, "epochs": 8 }, "mean": 0.0228443113155663 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003, "epochs": 8 }, "mean": 0.006279829074628651 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.01, "epochs": 8 }, "mean": 0.005194205295993015 } ], "full": { "mean": 0.004214190877974033, "std": 0.0026682777355217157, "per_seed": [ 0.002182353986427188, 0.008899358101189137, 0.0017826670082286, 0.007912442088127136, 0.003060318995267153, 0.0012072835816070437, 0.0036685036029666662, 0.005000599659979343 ], "n": 8 } }, "idea": { "mean": 0.004029877163702622, "std": 0.0015034226018154422, "per_seed": [ 0.0031153184827417135, 0.0026313886046409607, 0.006552070379257202, 0.0028610709123313427, 0.005238592624664307, 0.002022449392825365, 0.004396332893520594, 0.005421794019639492 ], "n": 8, "selected_cfg": { "lr": 0.01, "epochs": 8 } }, "comparison": { "delta_mean": -0.0001843137142714113, "idea_wins": 2, "n_pairs": 8, "per_seed_diffs": [ 0.0009329644963145256, -0.006267969496548176, 0.004769403371028602, -0.0050513711757957935, 0.002178273629397154, 0.0008151658112183213, 0.0007278292905539274, 0.0004211943596601486 ], "p_value": 0.9399, "mde": 0.003068421703670571, "mde_rel_pct": 72.81164504693035, "verdict": "no significant win", "system_worked": false }, "mechanism_signature": { "prediction": "recursive predicted variance should calibrate observed squared error near 1 and track heteroscedasticity", "predicted_vs_observed": { "mean_q_recursive": 0.8105446696281433, "mean_observed_squared_error": 0.005421794019639492, "calibration_ratio_mean": 0.005157590081528752, "q_error_correlation_mean": -0.09872341295990021 }, "confirmed": false } }, "system_verdict": "failed", "practical_verdict": "inconclusive", "mechanism_ok": 0, "system_judged": true }