# Стенд-проверка (stage-2) · промт оператора: (универсальный) Ответ агента: { "worked": false, "confidence": 9, "verdict": "The registered built-in dynamics track was benchmarked with rnn_small under the full 8-seed paired protocol. The Lyapunov intervention produced a small lower MSE, but the paired permutation test was not significant, and the trained-model gradient-energy ratio contradicted the predicted contraction; therefore the system did not work.", "metrics": { "baseline": "Best tuned Adam baseline lr=0.01: test MSE 0.0015652803 ± 0.0007422460 over 8 seeds.", "idea": "Best finite-horizon regularized model lr=0.01, M=4, alpha=0.1, lambda=0.002, beta=0.9: test MSE 0.0015269540 ± 0.0007877648; paired delta=-0.0000383263, p=0.46705.", "mechanism": "Trained-model mean V[k+4]/V[k]=1.827379, violation rate=0.039474; contraction prediction was not confirmed." }, "how_to_run": "/home/maxwelhelp/main/bin/python3 bench_stage2.py", "files": [ "bench_stage2.py", "bench_report.json" ], "limitations": "The final protocol used 800 training samples, 300 test samples, and 6 epochs to fit the runtime budget. Baseline and idea used the same three learning rates and all 8 paired seeds. Only the gradient certificate was tested; hidden-state certificates, other M values, lambda sweeps, and longer training were not tested.", "bench_report": { "bench_version": 1, "track": "dynamics", "model": "rnn_small", "metric_direction": "lower is better", "n_seeds": 8, "baseline": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.01 }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.001 }, "mean": 0.015694387606345117 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003 }, "mean": 0.0023102034465409815 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.01 }, "mean": 0.0013842678163200617 } ], "full": { "mean": 0.0015652802903787233, "std": 0.0007422459790989128, "per_seed": [ 0.0013847877271473408, 0.0011940097901970148, 0.0015944147016853094, 0.0013638590462505817, 0.0008487981976941228, 0.000910585920792073, 0.001885351026430726, 0.0033404359128326178 ], "n": 8 } }, "idea": { "mean": 0.0015269540235749446, "std": 0.000787764827387549, "per_seed": [ 0.0010921545326709747, 0.0012567200465127826, 0.0015678050694987178, 0.0012287304271012545, 0.0008476584334857762, 0.0009015121031552553, 0.0018893856322392821, 0.0034316659439355135 ], "n": 8 }, "comparison": { "delta_mean": -3.832626680377871e-05, "idea_wins": 5, "n_pairs": 8, "per_seed_diffs": [ -0.00029263319447636604, 6.271025631576777e-05, -2.6609636591621626e-05, -0.00013512861914932728, -1.1397642083466053e-06, -9.073817636817694e-06, 4.03460580855608e-06, 9.123003110289574e-05 ], "p_value": 0.46705, "mde": 0.00010250800277371827, "mde_rel_pct": 6.548859230120136, "verdict": "no significant win", "system_worked": false }, "mechanism_signature": { "prediction": "Finite-horizon gradient energy should contract on average and persistent instability should produce positive residual violations.", "trained_model_measurements": { "idea_cfg": { "lr": 0.01 }, "observed_mean_v_ratio": 1.8273790166958381, "observed_violation_rate": 0.039473684210526314, "per_seed_summary": "Eight trained idea models; mean V[k+4]/V[k] measured as 1.827379 and mean violation rate measured as 0.039474." }, "confirmed": false, "certificate": { "M": 4, "alpha": 0.1, "lambda": 0.002, "beta": 0.9 } } }, "system_verdict": "failed", "practical_verdict": "inconclusive", "mechanism_ok": 0, "system_judged": true }