# Стенд-проверка (stage-2) · промт оператора: (универсальный) Ответ агента: { "worked": false, "confidence": 9, "verdict": "Built a capitalization-efficiency monitor using epoch-level posterior-displacement KL as the information ledger, held-out validation improvement as value gain, and rollback/learning-rate reduction after low efficiency. On the matched tabular Friedman regression benchmark, the idea had MSE 6.84791 versus baseline 6.72020, paired delta +0.12771, permutation p=0.1856, and therefore no significant win. The behavior signature was supported: mean acquired information was 35.8822 and mean late efficiency was -0.5216, but this did not improve the independent task metric.", "metrics": { "baseline": "Adam, mlp_tiny, best lr=0.006, 8-seed mean MSE 6.7201979756, std 0.3792385032", "idea": "Capitalization monitor, mlp_tiny, best lr=0.006 and threshold=0.02, 8-seed mean MSE 6.8479101062, std 0.3795102409, paired delta +0.1277121305, permutation p=0.1856" }, "how_to_run": "/home/maxwelhelp/main/bin/python3 bench_run.py", "files": [ "bench_run.py", "bench_report.json" ], "bench_report": { "bench_version": 1, "track": "tabular", "model": "mlp_tiny", "metric_direction": "lower is better", "n_seeds": 8, "baseline": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.006 }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.0015 }, "mean": 8.577727317810059 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003 }, "mean": 6.8584965467453 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006 }, "mean": 6.626367449760437 } ], "full": { "mean": 6.720197975635529, "std": 0.3792385031605589, "per_seed": [ 6.333833694458008, 7.1719770431518555, 6.258625507354736, 6.741033554077148, 6.219150543212891, 6.970664978027344, 6.840729713439941, 7.225568771362305 ], "n": 8 } }, "idea": { "best_cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "threshold": 0.02 }, "sweep": [ { "cfg": { "lr": 0.0015, "threshold": 0.02 }, "mean": 8.962467908859253 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.003, "threshold": 0.02 }, "mean": 7.022419393062592 }, { "cfg": { "lr": 0.006, "threshold": 0.02 }, "mean": 6.847910106182098 } ], "per_seed": [ 6.578519821166992, 7.120673179626465, 6.699369430541992, 6.741033554077148, 6.219150543212891, 6.990142345428467, 6.840729713439941, 7.593662261962891 ], "mean": 6.847910106182098, "std": 0.3795102408701731, "n": 8 }, "comparison": { "delta_mean": 0.12771213054656982, "idea_wins": 1, "n_pairs": 8, "per_seed_diffs": [ 0.24468612670898438, -0.051303863525390625, 0.44074392318725586, 0.0, 0.0, 0.019477367401123047, 0.0, 0.36809349060058594 ], "p_value": 0.1856, "mde": 0.16181177964695484, "mde_rel_pct": 2.407842450975595, "verdict": "no significant win", "system_worked": false }, "mechanism_signature": { "quantity": "trained-model epoch displacement KL and held-out validation value/ledger", "prediction": "late low-value updates acquire positive KL and have eta near zero or negative", "observed_mean_info": 35.882227032415834, "observed_mean_late_eta": -0.5215707736578389, "observed_rollbacks": 1.25, "confirmed": true }, "protocol_notes": { "n_train": 2000, "n_test": 500, "epochs": 15, "common_validation_fraction": 0.2, "track_match": "tabular is the built-in optimizer/scheduler track" } }, "limitations": "Only the structurally matched built-in tabular track was tested; optimizer-noise dissipation Sigma was omitted, the posterior variance was fixed, and the value estimate used a held-out validation buffer rather than paired deletion-counterfactual evaluations. The monitor threshold was fixed rather than independently swept.", "system_verdict": "partial", "practical_verdict": "inconclusive", "mechanism_ok": 1, "system_judged": true }