Generate discrete configurations globally with an autoregressive model and then refine them using a continuous-time Markov chain of local single-site replacement moves. Use importance weights and the paper's normalized ESS to adapt the CTMC refinement budget and to reject training batches in which the proposal has collapsed onto a few modes.
Train a cheap neural surrogate globally, then use an ensemble or bootstrap covariance to identify inputs near the estimated upper-tail boundary and inputs where high-fidelity correction is uncertain. Fit a Tikhonov-regularized residual model on the acquired expensive labels and use the corrected predictor for CVaR estimation or risk-constrained optimization. The acquisition policy deliberately ignores easy central-region samples unless they influence the tail threshold.
Attach an exact structural uncertainty report to any best-of-N evaluation: after measuring reliability only for budgets n = 1,...,m, report that deployment reliability at budget N is unresolved by at least B_{m,N}. Use this width to select the smallest audit budget that makes a claimed reliability gap meaningful, or reject model comparisons whose validation budget lies below the square-root-of-N threshold.
Replace MAP scoring of discrete latent configurations by comparison of the total energy-model mass assigned to each candidate class. Estimate each class partition function with annealed importance sampling driven by identical random seeds, then return a prediction only when a paired bootstrap confidence interval certifies that its log-partition score exceeds every competitor.