Lipschitz-Inflated Conformal Trajectory Tube / bench_report.json
Mechanism confirmed, baseline not beaten
1{
2 "bench_version": 1,
3 "track": "dynamics",
4 "model": "rnn_small",
5 "metric_direction": "lower is better",
6 "n_seeds": 8,
7 "baseline": {
8 "best_cfg": {
9 "lr": 0.01,
10 "radius": "constant"
11 },
12 "sweep": [
13 {
14 "cfg": {
15 "lr": 0.001,
16 "radius": "constant"
17 },
18 "mean": 0.14777550008147955
19 },
20 {
21 "cfg": {
22 "lr": 0.003,
23 "radius": "constant"
24 },
25 "mean": 0.02788990270346403
26 },
27 {
28 "cfg": {
29 "lr": 0.01,
30 "radius": "constant"
31 },
32 "mean": 0.010466416599228978
33 }
34 ],
35 "full": {
36 "mean": 0.009070940839592367,
37 "std": 0.0043108428117023265,
38 "per_seed": [
39 0.01107354648411274,
40 0.007685416843742132,
41 0.006489071529358625,
42 0.016617631539702415,
43 0.014132681302726269,
44 0.008140470832586288,
45 0.002562329638749361,
46 0.005866378545761108
47 ],
48 "n": 8
49 }
50 },
51 "idea": {
52 "mean": 0.009070940839592367,
53 "std": 0.0043108428117023265,
54 "per_seed": [
55 0.01107354648411274,
56 0.007685416843742132,
57 0.006489071529358625,
58 0.016617631539702415,
59 0.014132681302726269,
60 0.008140470832586288,
61 0.002562329638749361,
62 0.005866378545761108
63 ],
64 "n": 8,
65 "selected_per_seed": [
66 {
67 "seed": 0,
68 "best_lr": 0.01,
69 "metric": 0.01107354648411274
70 },
71 {
72 "seed": 1,
73 "best_lr": 0.01,
74 "metric": 0.007685416843742132
75 },
76 {
77 "seed": 2,
78 "best_lr": 0.01,
79 "metric": 0.006489071529358625
80 },
81 {
82 "seed": 3,
83 "best_lr": 0.01,
84 "metric": 0.016617631539702415
85 },
86 {
87 "seed": 4,
88 "best_lr": 0.01,
89 "metric": 0.014132681302726269
90 },
91 {
92 "seed": 5,
93 "best_lr": 0.01,
94 "metric": 0.008140470832586288
95 },
96 {
97 "seed": 6,
98 "best_lr": 0.01,
99 "metric": 0.002562329638749361
100 },
101 {
102 "seed": 7,
103 "best_lr": 0.01,
104 "metric": 0.005866378545761108
105 }
106 ]
107 },
108 "comparison": {
109 "delta_mean": 0.0,
110 "idea_wins": 0,
111 "n_pairs": 8,
112 "per_seed_diffs": [
113 0.0,
114 0.0,
115 0.0,
116 0.0,
117 0.0,
118 0.0,
119 0.0,
120 0.0
121 ],
122 "p_value": 1.0,
123 "mde": 0.0,
124 "mde_rel_pct": 0.0,
125 "verdict": "no measurable effect",
126 "system_worked": false
127 },
128 "mechanism_signature": {
129 "prediction": "dense tube radius is affine in nearest-observation distance with slope Gamma",
130 "radius_slope_predicted_mean": 0.23295989949256185,
131 "radius_slope_observed_mean": 0.2329598994925619,
132 "radius_slope_abs_error_mean": 8.326672684688674e-17,
133 "tube_coverage_mean": 0.9995028409090909,
134 "constant_radius_coverage_mean": 0.9989109848484848,
135 "median_radius_mean": 0.6557790094055236,
136 "confirmed": true,
137 "trained_model_measurements": true,
138 "note": "The fixed dynamics bench predicts a single endpoint, so dense coverage is a diagnostic interpolation signature; endpoint MSE is the independent primary metric."
139 },
140 "protocol_notes": {
141 "baseline_grid": [
142 {
143 "lr": 0.001,
144 "radius": "constant"
145 },
146 {
147 "lr": 0.003,
148 "radius": "constant"
149 },
150 {
151 "lr": 0.01,
152 "radius": "constant"
153 }
154 ],
155 "idea_grid": [
156 {
157 "lr": 0.001,
158 "tube": "q+Gamma*delta"
159 },
160 {
161 "lr": 0.003,
162 "tube": "q+Gamma*delta"
163 },
164 {
165 "lr": 0.01,
166 "tube": "q+Gamma*delta"
167 }
168 ],
169 "paired_seeds": [
170 0,
171 1,
172 2,
173 3,
174 4,
175 5,
176 6,
177 7
178 ],
179 "epochs": 6,
180 "n_train": 500,
181 "n_test": 160,
182 "structural_match": "continuous-time trajectory uncertainty and stability -> dynamics"
183 }
184}